Like a lot of people, I see the conflict between religious fundamentalist theocrats and secular democrats to be pretty much the central conflict of our time.
I'm not just talking about the Islamic fundamentalist douchebags behind the 9/11 attacks; we have our own homegrown Christian fundamentalist douchebags who revere a fictional United States of the past and loathe the actual United States they live in. (Two such douchebags famously said this stuff on the air, but their ilk spews similar crap all the time.) A Jewish fundamentalist douchebag killed Yitzhak Rabin and probably succeeded in his inexplicable goal of perpetuating genocidal hatred in Israel and Palestine for a few more years.
I assume that the Hindus killing muslims in India are fundamentalist Hindu douchebags, but I don't really know enough about that area.
I will say that you never really hear about Buddhists killing people in the name of their faith. Please correct me in the comments if I'm wrong about this, but apart from the occasional self-immolation, which is a pretty polite form of violence in that it only affects the perpetrator, I don't think Buddhists get violent about Buddhism.
Militant athiests are every bit as annoying as religious fundamentalists in their smug insistence that they have exclusive access to ultimate truth and that everyone who thinks differently from them is an idiot, but I don't think they really kill people in the name of athiesm, so good for them.
Okay, so religious fundamentalism is pretty much of an infected boil on the butt cheek of Earth these days, but it has, indirectly, had one positive effect.
When I was in high school, up until my junior year in college, the awful awful music of Cat Stevens was nearly ubiquitous. His greatest hits albums was one of those records, like the James Taylor greatest hits record, that young men feigning sensitivity would cue up whenever they were trying to impress women with their fake sensitivity. As you can imagine, this led to it being played all the time. Really, Cat Stevens' music was a mainstay of folky types--chances are, up until 1988, if you owned any folk-rock at all, you probably had at least one Cat Stevens record, and his songs were on the radio all the time.
The other day, I was biking past the studios of Emerson College's WERS and heard the unmistakable sound of Cat's execrable generation gap anthem "Father To Son" booming from the sidewalk speakers. (This pretty much sums up why I don't listen to WERS, by the way.) And I realized I hadn't heard anything by Cat Stevens in years. Years!
This, of course, is because Cat Stevens converted to Islam, changed his name to Yusuf Islam, and, in true fundamentalist douchebag fashion, supported in word, if not deed, the death sentence issued against Salman Rushdie by the theocratic leader of Iran. This was because in the otherwise incomprehensible and insufferably pretentious novel The Satanic Verses, there's a part that suggests that at least part of the Holy Quran came about due to human, rather than divine agency.
Yusuf now denies that he said what he actually said and pretty much tries to soft pedal the fact that he was calling for a guy to be killed because of a book he wrote. Wikipedia rebuts that pretty succinctly and thoroughly here.
Worldwide revulsion among thinking people over Yusuf Islam's comments led to the awful music of Cat Stevens being effectively dropped from the pop music canon almost immediately. If not everybody wrecked their Cat Stevens albums, nobody played them. Ever.
This has led to an entire generation of music listeners having no freaking idea who this guy is. It's a small good thing, vastly outweighed by the horrors fundamentalism has unleashed around the world, but it is something.






Recent Comments